Fig. 1
From: Pattern of body fat distribution in patients of PCOS using DEXA-based indices
a Pair-wise correlation between arm fat mass and leg fat mass. The first graph above shows the log-likelihood function of the difference between the arm fat mass and leg fat mass. The second shows a uniform prior distribution which suggests no prior belief. The third graph shows the plot of the posterior distribution of 0.8. b Pair-wise correlation between trunk fat mass and android fat mass. The first graph above shows the log-likelihood function of the difference between the trunk fat mass and Android fat mass. The second shows a uniform prior distribution, this suggests no prior belief. The third graph shows the plot of the posterior distribution of 0.8. c Pair-wise correlation between trunk fat mass and fat mass/height2. The first graph above shows the log-likelihood function of the difference between the trunk fat mass and fat mass/height2. The second shows a uniform prior distribution, this suggests no prior belief. The third graph shows the plot of the posterior distribution of 0.8. d Pair-wise correlation between trunk fat mass and android-gynoid ratio. The first graph above shows the log-likelihood function of the difference between the trunk fat mass and the android/gynoid ratio. The second shows a uniform prior distribution which suggests no prior belief. The third graph shows the plot of the posterior distribution of 0.8. e Pair wise correlation between android fat mass and fat mass/height2 ratio. The first graph above shows the log-likelihood function of the difference between the Android fat mass and fat mass/ht2. The second one shows a uniform prior distribution—this suggests no prior belief. The third graph shows the plot of the posterior distribution of 0.9. f Pair wise correlation between android fat mass and android-gynoid ratio. The first graph above shows the log-likelihood function of the difference between the Android fat mass and android/gynoid ratio. The second shows a uniform prior distribution—this suggests no prior belief. The third graph shows the plot of the posterior distribution of 0.8