Study | Type of study | Number of patients | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|
Sills et al. 2019, [6] | Case series | 4 | Improved ovarian function in all cases, Increase AMH, Decrease FSH or both. IVF: retrieval of 5.3 ± 1.3 MII oocytes. |
Petryk et al. 2020 [8] | Interventional | 38 | Significant improvement in hormone levels; 6 babies were born, 10 pregnancies were achieved, and 4 out of the 10 were from natural conception. |
Singh et al. 2020 [9] | Interventional | 30 | No benefit in increasing AMH, AFC, ovarian response to COS or IVF outcome |
Mello et al. 2020 [10] | Controlled non randomized | 46 | PRP Vs control G: Sig improvement in FSH, AMH, AFC. Biochemical (26.1% vs 5.4%) and cl pregnancy (23.9% vs 5.4%) were higher. |
Sills et al. 2020 [11] | Case series | 182 | Improved AMH in (28%) with median increase of 167%. Mean interval to maximum AMH increase was 4 w (range 2–10 w). |
Jacman et al. 2020 [12] | Case series retrospective | 140 | PRP can stimulate follicular development for at least 6 weeks following the intraovarian injection. |
Total | Â | 369 | Â |