Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of participants’ knowledge of FP options, awareness of fertility centers providing fertility preservation services, and adverse effects of cancer and cancer treatment by age group (< 18, respondent = parents; ≥ 18 respondent = patient)

From: Adult cancer patients and parents of younger cancer patients have little information about fertility preservation: a survey of knowledge and attitude

FP options

< 18 years

n (%)

≥ 18 years

n (%)

Siga

Embryo cryopreservation

Yes

3(3.7)

35 (11.6)

0.03*

No

78(96.3)

268 (88.4)

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation

Yes

4 (4.9)

30 (9.9)

0.19

No

77 (95.1)

272 (90.1)

Oocyte cryopreservation

Yes

4 (4.9)

34 (11.3)

0.09

No

77 (95.1)

268 (88.7)

Ovarian transposition

Yes

3 (3.7)

30 (10)

0.07

No

78 (96.3)

271 (90)

gonadotropin releasing hormones (GnRH)

Yes

1 (1.2)

17 (5.7)

0.13

No

80 (98.8)

282 (94.3)

Sperm cryopreservation

Yes

2 (2.5)

33 (11)

0.01*

No

79 (97.5)

268 (89)

Testicular tissue cryopreservation

Yes

2 (2.5)

22 (7.3)

0.12

No

79 (97.5)

278 (92.7)

Awareness

    

Side effects of cancer treatments on fertility

Yes

21 (26.3)

41 (14.1)

0.01*

No

59 (73.8)

250 (85.9)

The possibility of transferring genes and traits attributed to cancer to the next generation

Yes

25 (30.9)

116 (39.3)

0.16

No

56 (69.1)

179 (60.7)

Fertility clinics providing fertility preservation services

Yes

8 (9.9)

70 (23.3)

0.008*

No

73 (90.1)

231(76.7)

  1. *P < 0.05 was statistically significant
  2. aP value is obtained by chi2 test